Found Mold or Leaks After Closing in Ontario? Can You Sue the Seller?

Legal Knowledge · Ontario Real Estate Series

Discovered Water Leaks or Mold After Closing in Ontario: Can You Sue the Seller?

Last Updated: October 2026

The fundamental rule of resale home transactions in Ontario is "buyer beware" (caveat emptor): buyers are responsible for inspecting the property themselves, and sellers generally have no obligation to actively point out defects. However, exceptions exist: if the seller knowingly conceals latent defects, fails to disclose known defects that threaten residential safety or health, or makes false statements when asked, the buyer may claim damages or, in severe cases, rescind the transaction.

Summary

  • The key relies on two factors: whether the issue could have been discovered through a normal home inspection, and whether the seller knew about it beforehand.
  • Evidence must be secured prior to repairs: take photos and videos, obtain professional written reports, and retain brokerage materials and chat records.
  • The general limitation period is 2 years from the date the issue was discovered. For claims under $50,000 CAD, lawsuits may be brought in the Ontario Small Claims Court.

Frequently Asked Questions from Clients

"During the first heavy rain after moving in, the basement flooded. The neighbor said this house floods every year."
"Upon lifting the flooring, we discovered mold everywhere, and the walls were obviously freshly painted."
"When buying, we asked the seller if there had ever been any water leaks, and he said no."
"We didn't get a home inspection done; can we still sue now?"

1. First Distinction: Patent Defects vs. Latent Defects

The courts first distinguish between two categories of defects:

Patent Defect

Issues that can be discovered by a buyer through ordinary inspection and reasonable diligence, such as visible water stains, cracks, or damaged equipment. For such issues, the principle of "caveat emptor" applies, and the seller has no obligation to warn the buyer.

Latent Defect

Issues that are not obvious and difficult to discover through normal inspection, often related to structure, plumbing, foundation, or interior walls. Whether a buyer can hold a seller accountable primarily focuses on this category.

Therefore, for issues discovered after closing, the first step is to assess: could they have been discovered if a thorough viewing and home inspection had been conducted initially?

Case Law: Giancola v. Dobrydnev

In Giancola v. Dobrydnev (2020 ONSC 6007, aff'd 2021 ONCA 793), the buyer refused to close based on water damage to the basement floor. The court held that it was a patent defect discoverable upon inspection, and the buyer had no right to terminate the agreement, ultimately being ordered to pay over $300,000 CAD in damages to the seller.

2. Under What Circumstances is the Seller Liable?

A latent defect alone does not automatically impose liability on the seller. Ontario courts generally find the seller liable under the following circumstances:

1. The Seller Knew of the Issue and Actively Concealed It

For example, repainting over water stains, blocking mold spots with furniture or storage, or temporarily patching the surface to hide the problem. The courts hold that active concealment renders the principle of "caveat emptor" inapplicable, allowing the buyer to claim damages or, in severe cases, rescind the transaction.

2. The Seller Knew of a Latent Defect That Endangers Safety, Health, or Habitability, Yet Remained Silent

Even if the seller did not actively conceal the defect, remaining silent while knowing of serious latent defects (such as recurring severe water intrusion or health-hazardous contamination) may constitute fraudulent concealment. Sevidal v. Chopra (1987) 64 O.R. (2d) 169 is a case where the seller was held liable for failing to disclose radioactive contamination on the property.

3. The Seller Made False Statements

Sellers are not obligated to complete a Seller Property Information Statement (SPIS), nor are they required to answer questions; however, once they speak, they must do so truthfully and completely. In Krawchuk v. Scherbak (2011 ONCA 352), the seller provided inaccurate disclosures regarding foundation settlement in the statement, and the Ontario Court of Appeal held the seller liable, while also finding the seller's agent liable for breach of duty.

Similarly, if a buyer asks during a viewing, "Has there ever been any water leaks?" and the seller answers "No" when the opposite is true, that statement itself may constitute a misrepresentation. It is best to keep written records of inquiries, such as asking via agent emails or text messages.

4. Express Warranties in the Contract

If explicit representations or warranties made by the seller in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale are inconsistent with the facts, the buyer may assert rights based on the contract.

Conversely, problems that the seller genuinely did not know about generally do not constitute seller liability. In such cases, an alternative direction to consider is whether the home inspector was negligent, though home inspection contracts typically limit liability and require specific review.

3. What to Do Immediately After Discovering the Issue?

  • Secure Evidence Before Repairs: Take photos and videos, record the date, location, and scope; necessary emergency mitigation (such as stopping a leak) can be performed, but try to have professionals present before extensive demolition and restoration.
  • Obtain Professional Written Reports: Reports from plumbers, waterproofing companies, structural engineers, or mold testing agencies detailing the cause of the problem and how long it has likely existed serve as important evidence to prove "the seller ought to have known."
  • Collect Transaction Documents: Listing details and photos, SPIS, home inspection reports, Q&A records from viewings, chats and emails with real estate agents, and the Agreement of Purchase and Sale.
  • Understand Property History: Statements from neighbors, past repair receipts, insurance claim records, and municipal permit records may all indicate that the seller knew long beforehand.
  • Retain All Repair Invoices: Necessary for calculating damages in the future.

4. Limitation Period: Generally 2 Years

Under the Ontario Limitations Act, 2002, the general limitation period is 2 years from the date the claim is discovered. "Discovery" refers to the point in time when the buyer knew or ought to have known that damage had occurred, who caused it, and that a lawsuit was an appropriate means to seek remedy. Additionally, there is an ultimate 15-year limitation period from the date of the event.

The longer the delay, the harder it is to preserve evidence, and the more prone limitation issues are to dispute.

5. Which Court to Sue In?

01 Claims Under $50,000 CAD: As of October 1, 2025, the monetary jurisdiction limit of the Ontario Small Claims Court increased to $50,000 CAD, featuring relatively simpler procedures and shorter timelines.
02 Exceeding $50,000 CAD or Seeking Rescission of the Transaction: Lawsuits must be brought in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Prior to filing a lawsuit, a lawyer typically issues a demand letter to the seller outlining the issues, evidence, and claims for compensation; many disputes can be resolved through negotiation at this stage.

6. How to Prevent Issues Before Submitting an Offer?

  • Try to include a home inspection condition; even if waived during bidding wars, consider conducting a home inspection prior to submitting an offer.
  • Ask critical questions in writing: whether there has been water intrusion, whether waterproofing was done, and whether basement renovations have permits, by submitting questions in writing through your agent and keeping the responses.
  • Read the SPIS carefully: if the seller fills it out, they are responsible for its contents; if the seller refuses to fill it out, that in itself is a signal to consider.
  • Pre-closing Re-inspection: Agreements typically provide buyers an opportunity to view the property before closing, focusing on areas that were blocked by furniture or storage during viewings.

7. How H. Law Firm Can Assist

H. Law Firm features both a real estate team and a civil and commercial litigation practice. We can review the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, SPIS, and transaction records to assess whether the seller bears liability, assist in issuing demand letters, negotiate settlements, and represent clients in Small Claims Court or Superior Court litigation when necessary. Fee estimates and itemized lists are provided prior to engagement; all services commence upon signing a formal retainer agreement.

Legal Provisions and Case Law References

  • Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sched. B, ss. 4, 5, 15
  • Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 and its regulations (Small Claims Court monetary limit is $50,000 CAD as of October 1, 2025)
  • Krawchuk v. Scherbak, 2011 ONCA 352
  • Giancola v. Dobrydnev, 2020 ONSC 6007, aff’d 2021 ONCA 793
  • Sevidal v. Chopra (1987), 64 O.R. (2d) 169 (H.C.J.)

This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice for any specific situation.

H.

H. LAW FIRM

H. Law Professional Corporation

Address: 208-7050 Woodbine Ave, Markham, ON L3R 4G8
Phone: 647-930-6688 | Fax: 647-930-8833
Website: www.hlawfirmontario.com
Serving the Greater Toronto Area: Toronto, Markham, Richmond Hill, North York, Vaughan, Scarborough, Mississauga

Encountering a Property Latent Defect Dispute? Contact Us to Evaluate Your Claim Options

Bilingual (English & Chinese) · Toronto & Markham & All Ontario

Consult Now →

Related Posts

Recent Articles

Can Grandparents Apply to Court to See Their Grandchildren If the Parents Say No?
October 27, 2026
Divorce and Taxes in Canada: Why Is Spousal Support Deductible but Child Support Isn’t?
October 23, 2026
Can I Change My Child’s Last Name After Divorce If the Other Parent Disagrees?
October 23, 2026